NM center on law and povert



Sunday, February 17, 2008

Public Defender Commission Could Bolster Fairness

    By D'Val Westphal

    Of the Journal

 

        It's the one piece of legislation that made it out of the 2008 legislative session that may help ensure poor New Mexicans accused of crimes get a fair shot at an adequate defense.

        House Bill 193, which creates a Public Defender Commission, made it through the Senate with just hours left in the session. A version of the plan died in the Senate last year, perhaps in part because much of the debate focused on the state funding stream— how little public defenders are allocated vs. how much prosecutors get ($36.7 million vs. $55.4 million in fiscal '07). And while the dollar figures were shocking, a lot of people were waiting to see a three-year report put together by the state Supreme Court's criminal justice task force breaking down who gets what and who needs what.

        That report, delivered in July, took the three branches of the judicial system— defense, prosecution and judicial— and via a complex formula showed all were trying to shove 10 pounds of justice through a five-pound tube. It recommended 35 more judges and 69 more prosecution employees. And it made it clear the defense was getting the shortest end of the financing stick, needing 86 more employees to adequately represent New Mexico's poor criminal defendants.

        Enter HB 193, now complete with hard stats from an unbiased source.

        Sponsored again by Rep. Al Park, D-Albuquerque, the bill emphasizes the need to move the Public Defender Department out from under the Governor's Office and make it an adjunct agency answering to a new 11-member commission.

        Homer Robinson, project manager for the New Mexico Coalition for Justice and a key proponent of the bill, says having the chief public defender appointed and answerable to the governor— the same person taxpayers expect to take a hard line on crime, the same person who decides enough is enough in the legal defense budget— makes it an untenable situation for the poor criminal defendant.

        He says common sense argues the chief public defender is unlikely to go against his boss and ask for more cash. And that means the movie version of court— when the defendant meets his/her harried public defender minutes before going before a judge and jumps at any plea deal to get out of jail to go home to family and job— is all too often the reality.

        The Public Defender Department stands against the bill— not surprising; officials there know which side their bread is currently buttered on— and says funding has already grown under the current system, the new system doesn't guarantee more, and the commission will create confusion and add a layer of bureaucracy.

        But the bill has pages and pages of wording that make it clear the chief public defender runs the department, not the commission. And instead of answering to a political animal, the department would report to a group of diverse but legally experienced people appointed by the governor, chief justice of the Supreme Court, dean of the University of New Mexico law school, state bar, Legislature, criminal defense bar and juvenile justice system.

        And that's 11 more lobbyists for the needs of the department.

        Former New Mexico chief public defenders, a former chief justice, various bar associations and the American Bar Association have argued in favor of the commission. Forty-two other states have chosen not to have their governor directly control their public defender department. Georgia and Montana each adopted a commission after being sued. Even so, Robinson thought this year's proposal was going to end up stuck in committee like last year. When he showed up to the Roundhouse on Thursday, "I didn't even wear a tie."

        He had to borrow one and make a mad dash for the Senate floor to catch the final vote. Now the plan depends on Gov. Bill Richardson, who opposed it last year. He's got fewer than 20 days to approve it.

        "We're hopeful the governor takes some time, gives it some considered thought," Robinson says. "It's the right thing to do; it doesn't cost him anything."

        And it could pay off big when it comes to equalizing the scales of justice.

 

URL:http://www.abqjournal.com/opinion/westphal/286074opinion02-17-08.htm

 

All content copyright © ABQJournal.com and Albuquerque Journal

 

Copyright ©2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.