|
Article by Kate Wilson
Appeared
in The Albuquerque
Journal
Sunday, March 11, 2007
Defense
Lawyers May Get New Boss
by Kate Wilson
Journal
Staff Writer
A
bill that would create a commission to oversee the state Public
Defender
Department— taking control away from the governor— is under
consideration at
the Roundhouse.
Backers of the measure say there's a better chance of getting improved
funding
and staffing for the Public Defender Department— and reduced case loads
for the
lawyers who represent indigent defendants— if the operation isn't under
the
governor.
"Public
defense is not a popular issue," said Santa Fe defense attorney Mark
Donatelli.
"No governor ever got elected on the strength of the public defender
acquittal rate. That doesn't get him elected. It's a lot easier to get
money
for the prosecution. That's what constituents want."
But
chief public defender John Bigelow said his boss— Gov. Bill Richardson—
has
done more than any lobbyist could to bulk up his department's
budget. And
a much-anticipated study expected to be completed this summer will give
the
state an accurate database detailing the current and future needs of
the
department, Bigelow said.
Overworked defenders
Over
the past few years, public defenders, defense lawyers and others have
complained about the case loads for public defenders and what they
consider an
inadequate budget.
In
April 2005, then-New Mexico Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Bosson
took up
the cause and said that if the state can't come up with a plan to save
indigent
criminal defense, the system could collapse.
Santa Fe
public
defender Sydney West, in a 2006 motion in a murder case, declared a
"case
load emergency" in her office, saying public defenders had been
assigned
as many as 179 felony cases in less than a year's time.
And
in another case— after a judge wanted to know why an Edgewood man spent
more
than three years in jail without his case going to trial— two public
defenders
testified they had caseloads of 200 cases and 300 cases respectively.
The
governor now appoints the chief public defender and approves the
department's
budget.
House
Bill 348, sponsored by Rep. Al Park, D-Albuquerque, would create an
11-member
independent commission, appointed by a variety of public officials and
groups,
to oversee the Public Defender Department.
It
was passed March 1 by the House in a 54-8 vote, and it made it through
its
first Senate committee Friday night. The legislative session ends next
Saturday.
Homer Robinson,
a staff attorney
with the New Mexico
Center
for Law and
Poverty, said Park's bill would eliminate what amounts to a conflict of
interest for a chief public defender working for the governor.
"Right
now the governor appoints the chief, who controls the budget requests
of the
department," Robinson said.
"So what you have is a governor who puts together a crime package; the
chief public defender, appointed by the governor, won't speak against
it, even
if it has a negative impact on the public defender
clients."
Robinson said public defenders now can't lobby for "a true need-based
budget."
"The
district attorneys"— who are independent from the governor and who
regularly lobby at the Roundhouse— "can ask for whatever they want. The
public defenders should be advocating for what's
best for
the department, but can't. They're effectively muzzled."
Bigelow,
who has served three terms as chief public defender, scoffed at that
assumption.
"Some
people would like to have you think that agency heads are muzzled and
can't ask
for what they need, but that's not true," he said.
Bigelow
said his department gets more support being under Richardson's wing than it would under
a
commission.
"When
I have a problem, when I want to get something done, I can go to
whoever the
governor is and say, 'Can you help me with this?'" Bigelow said.
"The
chief public defender is part of an administration; he gets access to
the
people who are in charge of that administration. If I had a public
defender
commission, none of those people would have the same avenues of help as
the
governor's office has."
Controversial e-mail
Donatelli
has been outspoken in calling for more money for indigent defense. He
said
recent budget increases for the Public Defender Department are a
long-overdue drop in the bucket.
"After
they starve the department they throw a few crumbs at it," he said last
week,
Currently,
the public defender's office operates on a budget two-thirds that of
the
district attorneys' association, Robinson said.
The
2007 budget for the Public Defender Department is $36,790,000. The
operating
budget for district attorneys is $55,473,000.
In
2005, Bigelow sent his employees an e-mail before the legislative
session
began.
"We
support the governor's budget, of which we are a part during the
session,"
it read.
"You
should not contact legislators and ask for different or more,
regardless of how
meritorious you believe your idea or cause should be."
After
the American Civil Liberties Union called on Bigelow to retract the
e-mail,
Bigelow sent his employees a second message saying the public defenders
always
had the right to contact legislators or other public officials, "so
long
as it is done on their own time" and that they make clear they don't
speak
on behalf of the Public Defender Department.
Study under way
Under
Park's bill, public defender commission members would be appointed by
the
governor, the state Supreme Court, the dean of the University of New
Mexico
law school, the president of the state Bar Association, the speaker of
the
House, the Senate president pro tem, the Criminal Defense Lawyers
Association
and the state Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee. There would be seats
designated for advocates for the mentally ill, the homeless and ethnic
minorities.
Among
the commission's duties would be to "exercise independent oversight of
the
department" and to develop standards for the department's operations
including "ethically responsible caseload and workload levels."
Robinson
sat in on a recent meeting with Park and Richardson.
"We
just wanted to explain the
bill," Robinson said. "It was a pretty good meeting. He (Richardson)
said he would consider it."
But
John Goldstein, a spokesman for Richardson,
said the governor opposes Park's bill.
"It's
not clear to us that it will accomplish its objectives to increase
support for
the public defender's office," Goldstein said.
"This
governor has made supporting the office a big priority, increasing
funding from
$29 million in 2003 to $37 million today. That's about a 25 percent
jump. And
staffing has increased from 314 to 362 today."
Bigelow
has other concerns.
"I'm
concerned the committee would interfere or make cumbersome my ability
to do my
job as an executive," he said. "One thing about a committee
structure, it's difficult to get consensus on just about anything."
Bigelow
said a thorough study, not a bill, is what's needed.
Bigelow
sits on the state's Supreme Court Justice Task Force, which has
petitioned for
money for a workload measurement study for various parts of the
criminal
justice system. The Legislature gave the task force $400,000.
The
task force hired the National
Center
for State Courts
and the American Prosecutors Research Institute to gather data from
every
public defender's office, district attorney's office and state courts
to create
a database.
"Here's
what we asked them to do: a study that will tell the judicial system
based on
objective statistical data what our true resource needs are," Bigelow
said, "so we can have a methodology to use when we go ask for money."
The
study should do two things, Bigelow said.
"It
will show current resource needs, not based on what Bigelow thinks or
what some
commission thinks, but based on real objective numbers," he said.
"And it will give us a formula for determining that in the future and
be
upgraded.
"So
what I'm telling everyone is, 'Relax. Let's wait until we get the
results of
the study. Let's see how it looks.' ''
The
task force hopes to get results of the study by July.
Robinson
said he isn't disputing that Richardson
has done a lot for the public defender's office.
"This
governor has been the best governor we've had in 20 years," he said.
"But it's not about this governor, it's about the structure. We can't
be
dependent on the goodwill of an individual."
|